top of page
Search

Why Can’t We All Just Get Along? - The Impact of Social and Cultural Geographic Settings on Intergenerational Work Cultures

by Winslow Swart


I didn’t realize how individualistic the society I grew up in was until I moved to Japan. Actually, it was when I moved back to Southern California when it really hit me. The constant bowing, truly listening to “how someone was doing” the whole “no, after you” culture of Japan was in stark contrast to the rather abrupt, self-interested world I had returned to. When I explored moving to South Central Texas, the mix of southern hospitality and Latin culture felt more like Japan than the West Coast in terms of being “others oriented.”  This, then, takes us to the topic intergenerationally - the idea that multiple generations not only co-exist, but thrive due to their interdependence, within certain settings. Here, I'll provide a pracademic overview, as the subject of creating intergenerational work cultures within our organizations becomes increasingly relevant in the workplace today.


An intergenerational work culture is one that values and leverages the strengths of employees across different age groups, promoting collaboration and mutual respect. However, the success of these initiatives is significantly influenced by the social and cultural geographic settings in which organizations operate.


The Role of Social Geography

Social geography, which examines how societal dynamics and spatial environments interact, plays a crucial role in shaping workplace cultures. Organizations in regions with a rich history of diversity and inclusion are generally more adept at fostering intergenerational cooperation. For instance, metropolitan areas like New York City and London, known for their multicultural and multiethnic populations, tend to have workplaces that are more inclusive of various age groups. This inclusivity is often a reflection of broader societal norms that celebrate diversity and encourage the integration of different perspectives.


Conversely, in regions where social stratification is pronounced, creating a cohesive intergenerational work culture can be more challenging. In societies with rigid age hierarchies, younger employees may struggle to gain respect and voice their ideas, while older employees might be resistant to change. For example, in certain parts of Asia where seniority is deeply ingrained in the cultural fabric, younger workers might find it harder to challenge or collaborate with older colleagues without being perceived as disrespectful.


The author in Miyajima, Japan, a few decades ago

The Influence of Cultural Context

Cultural norms and values significantly shape how different generations interact in the workplace. In individualistic cultures, such as those prevalent in the United States and Western Europe, there is a strong emphasis on personal achievement and autonomy. These settings often encourage intergenerational collaboration by valuing the unique contributions of each individual, regardless of age. Programs like reverse mentoring, where younger employees mentor older ones on new technologies, thrive in these environments.

 

On the other hand, collectivist cultures, which prioritize group harmony and consensus, might face unique challenges in fostering intergenerational work cultures. In countries like Japan and South Korea, where collectivism and respect for elders are deeply embedded, younger employees may defer to older colleagues, potentially stifling innovation and intergenerational dialogue. However, these cultures also possess strengths such as strong communal bonds and loyalty, which can be harnessed to build cohesive teams that value all members’ input.


Urban vs. Rural Dynamics

The geographic divide between urban and rural areas further influences the creation of intergenerational work cultures. Urban areas, with their diverse populations and higher exposure to global trends, often lead in adopting inclusive workplace practices. Organizations in cities are more likely to implement flexible work arrangements and continuous learning opportunities that appeal to various age groups.


In contrast, rural areas may present a different set of dynamics. The workforce in rural regions often comprises employees who have lived in the community for most of their lives, leading to deeply rooted social ties and a shared cultural heritage. These close-knit communities can facilitate strong intergenerational relationships. However, the lack of exposure to diverse ideas and practices may also result in resistance to change and a slower adoption of innovative intergenerational practices.


The author studying Urasenke Tea Ceremony with Fukushima-sensei in Kumagaya, Japan

Technology and Globalization

Technological advancements and globalization are blurring geographic boundaries, yet local cultural and social contexts still significantly influence organizational dynamics. Multinational companies must navigate these nuances carefully. For instance, a strategy that promotes intergenerational collaboration in a tech hub like Silicon Valley might not translate effectively to a branch in a region with different social and cultural expectations.

Successful organizations are those that can adapt their strategies to the local context while maintaining a cohesive global culture. This involves not only understanding the local social and cultural geography but also actively engaging with it. Training programs, inclusive policies, and community engagement initiatives should be tailored to respect and integrate local norms and values.


Summarizing

The author in Kashima, Japan during a training mission.

In conclusion, the social and cultural geographic setting plays a pivotal role in shaping how well organizations can create intergenerational work cultures. While the challenges and opportunities vary across different regions, understanding and adapting to these local contexts is key to fostering a productive and harmonious intergenerational workforce. By valuing the unique strengths of each generation and integrating diverse cultural perspectives, organizations can build resilient and innovative teams that thrive in a globalized world.



 
 
bottom of page